‘No action in executive kidney transplant case’

A day after it emerged that the request of a top executive of a leading telecom firm for kidney transplant was turned down, the state organ transplant officer said that they would not take any action against the executive and the donor as they don’t have any proof to suggest that the prospective recipient and the donor (a watchman in Gujarat) are not related to each other.

The 65-year-old executive’s request was rejected by the state organ donation authorisation committee on March 9 on the grounds that there was some financial disparity between the donor and the recipient, and that the recipient’s relationship with the prospective donor could not be proved.

No old family photographs of donor and recipient together could be provided.

An anonymous email dated March 12 alleging that the executive was trying to ‘buy’ the kidney confirmed their doubts, said the officer.

The officer said that they have not initiated any action at their level but they are writing to the Gujarat state organ donation authorisation committee asking on what basis they gave a go-ahead for the transplant.

Dr Gauri Rathod, assistant director at Directorate of Health Services (DHS), who is nodal officer for the state’s human organ transplant programme, said that they don’t have any proof which says that the executive and his nephew, who is in his 50s, are not related to each other.

“We have turned down the recipient’s request for the simple reason that we have suspected some monetary angle. Nowhere have we mentioned that they are not related to each other. We have only raised doubt in this particular case, but we cannot take any action against the executive. We are writing to Gujarat organ donation authorisation committee to look into it and asking them on what basis have they given a go- ahead report for the transplant,” said Dr Rathod.

“In this case, we have received an anonymous email stating that the executive was trying to ‘buy’ the kidney for Rs 15 lakh and a job for the prospective donor’s son, which proves our suspicion,” added Dr Rathod.

Dr Rathod said that during the state’s organ donation authorisation committee meeting, other family members of the donor and recipients such as donor’s mother, sister and their children were not present.

  • Related Posts

    Chandigarh News: Dibar Pharmaceutical Company Misled PGI Through Fake Letter, Case Registered – Dibar Pharmaceutical Company Misled PGI Through Fake Letter, Case Registered

    Chandigarh:  A case has been registered against a pharmaceutical company for trying to mislead PGI by creating a fake letter from CDSCO (Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation) Baddi to prove…

    Kushinagar News: Truck Was Traveling From Ghaziabad To Agartala, Mystery Revealed When It Overturned

    Case of codeine syrup being hidden among sugar sacks in a truck. After receiving the documents, the pharmaceutical department sent them to Ghaziabad and Agartala and started investigation. Kushinagar/Rahsu Bazaar.…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    India Lifts Safeguard Measures On Isopropyl Alcohol Imports

    India Lifts Safeguard Measures On Isopropyl Alcohol Imports

    Punjab And Haryana HC Notice To Centre On Petition Against Misuse Of Oxytocin

    Punjab And Haryana HC Notice To Centre On Petition Against Misuse Of Oxytocin

    Nepal Drugs Regulator To Conduct On-Site Testing Of Medicines

    Nepal Drugs Regulator To Conduct On-Site Testing Of Medicines

    ‘Auric’ Relied On Amazon Reviews For Research Claims To Cure Fatty Liver

    ‘Auric’ Relied On Amazon Reviews For Research Claims To Cure Fatty Liver

    Misleading Ads Case: Patanjali Issues Public Apology In A Daily Newspaper

    Misleading Ads Case: Patanjali Issues Public Apology In A Daily Newspaper

    AFMS Collaborates With IIT Delhi To Develop Medical Devices

    AFMS Collaborates With IIT Delhi To Develop Medical Devices