Delhi High Court restricts lab technicians from certifying medical test reports

  • News
  • October 4, 2017

The Delhi High Court clearly bars lab technicians from verifying medical test reports and they can just perform tests and note their technical analysis. But the countersignature of a pathologist, registered with the medical council is a must to convert them into a certified report, observed the high court.

Justice Vibhu Bakhru on September 15, 2017, has ruled out the possibility of pathology laboratory technicians to certify medical test reports by performing tests. These orders have been made on a petition moved by Association of Clinical Microbiologists and Biochemists (ACMB) against Medical Council of India (MCI) on June 14, 2017, had communicated the decision of its executive committee that all lab reports should be signed/countersigned by persons registered with MCI/State Medical Councils. Association of Clinical Microbiologists and Biochemists stated that it is against the members valuable right to conduct their trade and profession. ACMB also stated that the announced result is without jurisdiction and contrary to Section 15(2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (IMC Act).

ACMB said their technicians are highly experienced and engaged in testing but not have the degree of MBBS and/or MD degrees, so can’t register by the MCI or State Medical Councils. Association said the conducting and submitting test is not an easy job, it required skills and knowledge, and their experts have amply qualification to certify reports.

National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibrating Laboratories, respondent no.3 is qualified to provide certification to pathology laboratories and no accreditation from MCI is required is also been stated. Vikas Singh drew court attention when stated clause (c) of Section 15(2) IMC Act which states no person other than a duly qualified medical practitioner is entitled to sign any medical report and said  IMC Act not provide any framework for prescribing the standards for technicians engaged in a pathology laboratory. So members of association can’t sign a medical report or a medical certificate.

After hearing arguments from both, Justice Vibhu Bakhru concluded that any diagnosis must necessarily be co-signed by a qualified medical practitioner.

  • Related Posts

    ‘A Knight in Shining Armor’ packed a punch in FOGSI for Gender Equality

    New Delhi: There was no fog in sight; FOGSI was shining as never before, thanks to the leadership of its outgoing president Dr Hrishikesh Pai. The over 40, 000 strong…

    • News
    • December 16, 2023
    • 16 views
    Women are on Trajectory to make Presence Felt in Healthcare India

    New Delhi: It could be advantage patients in times to come as women as workforce are increasing in healthcare domain of India. It is given that women power blended with…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Chhattisgarh Pharmacy Council Issued Certificates For Hundreds Of Fake Pharmacists Without Verification

    Chhattisgarh Pharmacy Council Issued Certificates For Hundreds Of Fake Pharmacists Without Verification

    Gujarat FDCA Approved 133 New Drug Manufacturing Units In FY24

    Gujarat FDCA Approved 133 New Drug Manufacturing Units In FY24

    DCGI Informs SLAs Antibiotic Combo Meropenem 1 Mg & EDTA For Injection Has No Approval

    DCGI Informs SLAs Antibiotic Combo Meropenem 1 Mg & EDTA For Injection Has No Approval

    DCA Raids Two Illegal Pharmacies; Seizes Stocks Of Over 60 Types Of Drugs

    DCA Raids Two Illegal Pharmacies; Seizes Stocks Of Over 60 Types Of Drugs

    Ramdev, Balkrishna Acharya Ready For ‘Public Apology’; Supreme Court Next Hearing On April 23

    Ramdev, Balkrishna Acharya Ready For ‘Public Apology’; Supreme Court Next Hearing On April 23

    Organovo’s Drug Significantly Reduces Liver Fat In NASH Study

    Organovo’s Drug Significantly Reduces Liver Fat In NASH Study