Risperdal drug case: Johnson & Johnson hit with $8bn court order over anti-psychotic drug

Johnson & Johnson must pay $8 billion in punitive damages to a man who previously won $680,000 over his claims that it failed to warn that young men using its antipsychotic drug Risperdal could grow breasts, a Philadelphia jury said on Tuesday. The Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas jury’s verdict in favor of Nicholas Murray came in the first case in which a Pennsylvania jury had been able to consider awarding punitive damages in one of thousands of Risperdal cases pending in the state.
“This jury, as have other juries in other litigations, once again imposed punitive damages on a corporation that valued profits over safety and profits over patients,” Murray’s lawyers, Tom Kline and Jason Itkin, said in a joint statement. ”Johnson & Johnson and (subsidiary) Janssen chose billions over children.”
J&J said the award was “grossly disproportionate with the initial compensatory award in this case, and the company is confident it will be overturned.” It added that the jury in the case had not been allowed to hear evidence of Risperdal’s benefits.
Professor Carl Tobias of the University of Richmond School of Law said he expects the punitive damages to be lowered on appeal, citing a U.S. Supreme Court decision which found that ”few awards exceeding a single-digit ratio between punitive and compensatory damages, to a significant degree, will satisfy due process.” Tobias said the verdict was about sending a message.
“A jury, if it’s outrageous enough conduct, will award a big number and let the lawyers and judges work it out,” he said.
Tobias added that the verdict could be a sign that J&J will face more large damages awards in other Risperdal cases.
“The kind of evidence in this trial may persuade another jury or judge to do something similar,” he said.
Murray, like other male plaintiffs in the mass tort litigation over Risperdal, alleges that he developed breasts after being prescribed the medicine when he was a minor. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the drug in late 1993 for treating schizophrenia and episodes of bipolar mania in adults. Plaintiffs claim that J&J failed to warn of the risk of gynecomastia, the development of enlarged breasts in males, associated with Risperdal, which they say the company marketed for unapproved uses with children.
In his lawsuit, Murray, now 26, alleged that he developed breasts after his doctors began prescribing him Risperdal off-label in 2003 after a psychologist diagnosed him with autism spectrum disorder. Doctors are allowed to prescribe medicines as they see fit, while companies are only allowed to promote their drugs for approved uses.

Related Posts

Dr Reddy’s delays semaglutide supplies due to API issue

MUMBAI: Dr Reddy’s Laboratories’ plans to capitalize on the early generic semaglutide market have hit a setback after manufacturing issues delayed supplies of the blockbuster diabetes and weight-loss drug, forcing…

India Tightens Rules On Alcohol-Containing Medicines

New rules on alcohol in medicine: The Centre has brought oral medicines containing more than 12% ethyl alcohol and sold in bottles larger than 30 ml under Schedule H1 In…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed

Dr Reddy’s delays semaglutide supplies due to API issue

Dr Reddy’s delays semaglutide supplies due to API issue

India Tightens Rules On Alcohol-Containing Medicines

India Tightens Rules On Alcohol-Containing Medicines

One more held in spurious plasma racket; police say he supplied 12 boxes

One more held in spurious plasma racket; police say he supplied 12 boxes

Wegovy, Ozempic regain weight as Indian generics fall behind

Wegovy, Ozempic regain weight as Indian generics fall behind

Drug regulator orders fresh safety labels for five common antimicrobials

Drug regulator orders fresh safety labels for five common antimicrobials

Rajasthan recalls labour-inducing drug after quality test failure

Rajasthan recalls labour-inducing drug after quality test failure