Delhi HC allows Zydus to sell biosimilar of blockbuster anti-cancer drug Nivolumab

‘Where the product in question is a life-saving drug, the Court has to err in favour of public interest’, said the bench

The Delhi High Court on Monday cleared the way for Zydus Lifesciences to manufacture and sell an anti-cancer drug, a biosimilar of an ER Squibb and Sons (better known as Bristol-Myers Squibb), in India.

The decision by a division bench of the High Court overturns a single judge’s decision from July 18, 2025, which had restrained Zydus from manufacturing and selling the drug, as an interim measure, in a suit by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) alleging patent infringement by the Indian firm.

The relief from the division bench for Zydus comes months before the patent is set to expire on May 2 this year.

In July 2024, Zydus’ Nivolumab was recommended by the SEC’s CDSCO for grant of permission to manufacture and market. Nivolumab, the monoclonal antibody drug by BMS, is marketed in India as Opdyta.

According to Zydus, as recorded in the court’s order, treatment using Zydus’ product, “would be 70% cheaper than treatment using the respondent’s (BMS) patented drug 5C4.”

A division bench of Justices C Hari Shankar and Justice Om Prakash Shukla on Monday held that “where the product in question is a life-saving drug, the Court has to err in favour of public interest… Withholding such therapy from the public can cause untold and irreparable prejudice to lakhs of lives, and it is, therefore, only where the Court is in possession of irrefutable material to indicate that a patented product is being released in the market without permission of the patentee… that an injunction can issue.”

The division bench took into account the public interest involved, that the patent is due to expire in four months’ time, and the fact that the single judge had mapped product-to-product claim to arrive at a conclusion of prima facie patent infringement, instead of product-to-claim mapping.

Product-to-product mapping involves comparison of the plaintiff’s patented product with the defendant’s product while product-to-claim mapping is a legal test where the infringement is decided on the basis of mapping the said infringing product to the original patent claims.

Source: The Indian Express

Related Posts

Offences Under Chapter IV Of Drugs And Cosmetics Act Triable Only By Sessions Court, Not Magistrate: Supreme Court

New Delhi: The Supreme Court held that offences relating to manufacture and sale of drugs under Chapter IV of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 cannot be tried by a…

Drug Inspector, Aide Caught By ACB Taking ₹20,000 Bribe

KAKINADA: Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) officials on Friday caught Drug Inspector Kampa Suresh Kumar of Jangareddygudem and his alleged private aide, Tadikamalla Siva Ramakrishna, red-handed while accepting a bribe of ₹20,000.…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed

Offences Under Chapter IV Of Drugs And Cosmetics Act Triable Only By Sessions Court, Not Magistrate: Supreme Court

Offences Under Chapter IV Of Drugs And Cosmetics Act Triable Only By Sessions Court, Not Magistrate: Supreme Court

Drug Inspector, Aide Caught By ACB Taking ₹20,000 Bribe

Drug Inspector, Aide Caught By ACB Taking ₹20,000 Bribe

Ayush Ministry Busts Illegal Ayurvedic Drug Factory in Dehradun: Over Rs 1 Crore Cash, Fake Medicines Seized in Major Raid

Ayush Ministry Busts Illegal Ayurvedic Drug Factory in Dehradun: Over Rs 1 Crore Cash, Fake Medicines Seized in Major Raid

Maha govt seeks ₹26.5 crore for state-wide drug tracking system amid spurious medicine crackdown

Maha govt seeks ₹26.5 crore for state-wide drug tracking system amid spurious medicine crackdown

Punjab and Haryana HC refuses bail to pharma owner in Rs 600 crore drugs diversion case

Punjab and Haryana HC refuses bail to pharma owner in Rs 600 crore drugs diversion case

Galgotia Outrage in AI Expo evokes SOS from Domestic MedTech Industry

Galgotia Outrage in AI Expo evokes SOS from Domestic MedTech Industry