Delhi HC allows Zydus to sell biosimilar of blockbuster anti-cancer drug Nivolumab

‘Where the product in question is a life-saving drug, the Court has to err in favour of public interest’, said the bench

The Delhi High Court on Monday cleared the way for Zydus Lifesciences to manufacture and sell an anti-cancer drug, a biosimilar of an ER Squibb and Sons (better known as Bristol-Myers Squibb), in India.

The decision by a division bench of the High Court overturns a single judge’s decision from July 18, 2025, which had restrained Zydus from manufacturing and selling the drug, as an interim measure, in a suit by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) alleging patent infringement by the Indian firm.

The relief from the division bench for Zydus comes months before the patent is set to expire on May 2 this year.

In July 2024, Zydus’ Nivolumab was recommended by the SEC’s CDSCO for grant of permission to manufacture and market. Nivolumab, the monoclonal antibody drug by BMS, is marketed in India as Opdyta.

According to Zydus, as recorded in the court’s order, treatment using Zydus’ product, “would be 70% cheaper than treatment using the respondent’s (BMS) patented drug 5C4.”

A division bench of Justices C Hari Shankar and Justice Om Prakash Shukla on Monday held that “where the product in question is a life-saving drug, the Court has to err in favour of public interest… Withholding such therapy from the public can cause untold and irreparable prejudice to lakhs of lives, and it is, therefore, only where the Court is in possession of irrefutable material to indicate that a patented product is being released in the market without permission of the patentee… that an injunction can issue.”

The division bench took into account the public interest involved, that the patent is due to expire in four months’ time, and the fact that the single judge had mapped product-to-product claim to arrive at a conclusion of prima facie patent infringement, instead of product-to-claim mapping.

Product-to-product mapping involves comparison of the plaintiff’s patented product with the defendant’s product while product-to-claim mapping is a legal test where the infringement is decided on the basis of mapping the said infringing product to the original patent claims.

Source: The Indian Express

Related Posts

AbbVie loses patent plea for Hep C drug

New Delhi: The Indian Patent Office has refused to grant a secondary patent to AbbVie for its blockbuster Hepatitis C drug combination glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, sold globally under the brand name Maviret.…

GSK’s Calpol a well-known trademark: High Court

New Delhi: In a relief to UK-headquartered GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals (GSK), the Delhi High Court has declared its pain and fever medicine ‘Calpol’ as a well-known trademark that has acquired extensive…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed

AbbVie loses patent plea for Hep C drug

AbbVie loses patent plea for Hep C drug

GSK’s Calpol a well-known trademark: High Court

GSK’s Calpol a well-known trademark: High Court

3 arrested for allegedly posing as doctors using forged MBBS degrees

3 arrested for allegedly posing as doctors using forged MBBS degrees

Commissioner FDA reviews enforcement measures

Commissioner FDA reviews enforcement measures

Karnataka High Court stays FSSAI advisory banning use of Ashwagandha leaves in health supplements

Karnataka High Court stays FSSAI advisory banning use of Ashwagandha leaves in health supplements

Roche Pharma launches Tecentriq® SC, India’s first subcutaneous immunotherapy for lung cancer

Roche Pharma launches Tecentriq® SC, India’s first subcutaneous immunotherapy for lung cancer