India to oppose planned patents rule

An effort by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) to bring in a new rule that would allow countries to delegate the functions of their patents office to another country or international organisation has set alarm bells ringing among many developing countries and activists working on access to medicines. They fear such a rule could result in smaller countries in particular being coerced to delegate these functions to countries or organisations that would push for more stringent intellectual property protection and easier patenting, which could affect access to medicines and India’s pharma exports to them.

The WIPO secretariat, which is responsible for administering the patent cooperation treaty (PCT), an international agreement of more than 150 countries including India, will bring this proposal at the 11th session of the PCT working group to take place from June 18 to 22 at the WIPO headquarters in Geneva. Public health activists have urged the Indian delegation to resist the move.

“This rule has been floated for some time. But India has been opposed to the harmonisation of patentability criteria and any attempt to do so will be opposed by our mission there. We can harmonise certain issues like being part of PCT, but patentability criteria is a country’s sovereign right. Any decision on that can only be done by modifying TRIPS and not decided by few countries,” said Rajiv Aggarwal, joint secretary in the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion.

The proposed rule states once the patent office functions have been delegated, the delegated office would “assume all rights and obligations in respect of the ‘delegating’ country”

The UN Secretary-General’s High Level Panel on Access to Medicines had recommended that multilateral organizations like WIPO should strengthen the capacity of national and regional patent examiners to apply criteria that are sensitive to public health concerns. However, this proposal could weaken national patent examination capacities.

Unlike India, which has set a very high bar for a patent to be granted, countries like the US grant patents even for new dosage forms of medicines and new drug delivery systems. Hence, functions being delegated to a country like the US would effectively mean the application of the same criteria in the country contracting out its patent office.

  • Related Posts

    ‘Did patients come dancing?’ – Rajasthan minister’s remarks about kidney failure case spark row

    On Thursday, Congress workers held protests against the “degrading medical conditions of Rajasthan” and attempted to enter the hospital premises. Rajasthan Health Minister Gajendra Singh Khinvsar’s remarks about women diagnosed…

    Price cap on 2 key cancer drugs increased by 50%

    NEW DELHI: Amid concerns over shortages of two critical cancer medicines, National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority has approved a 50% hike in ceiling prices of Carboplatin and Cisplatin injections, citing escalating…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    ‘Did patients come dancing?’ – Rajasthan minister’s remarks about kidney failure case spark row

    ‘Did patients come dancing?’ – Rajasthan minister’s remarks about kidney failure case spark row

    Price cap on 2 key cancer drugs increased by 50%

    Price cap on 2 key cancer drugs increased by 50%

    Hospitals can’t force patients to buy medicines from their pharmacies: Maha FDA

    Hospitals can’t force patients to buy medicines from their pharmacies: Maha FDA

    IIT Bhubaneswar researchers develop portable device for accurate arsenic detection

    IIT Bhubaneswar researchers develop portable device for accurate arsenic detection

    Bribe of Rs 3 crore: Delhi Police inspector held, senior public servant under CBI scanner

    Bribe of Rs 3 crore: Delhi Police inspector held, senior public servant under CBI scanner

    No raids till further orders: Maharashtra tells Bombay HC in Patanjali labelling case

    No raids till further orders: Maharashtra tells Bombay HC in Patanjali labelling case