US appeals court sides with Sun Pharma in Lipitor antitrust case

In an intimation to the stock exchange, the Mumbai-based drugmaker said, “the court of Appeals has affirmed the order of the District Court granting summary judgment in its entirety in favour of the Company and brings the litigation substantially to a close.

 

Mumbai: The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has delivered a favourable ruling for Sun Pharma in a litigation concerning the US market entry of widely used stain, atorvastatin generic alternative.

In an intimation the stock exchange, the Mumbai-based drugmaker said, “the court of Appeals has affirmed the order of the District Court granting summary judgment in its entirety in favour of the Company and brings the litigation substantially to a close.”

“The court in its ruling has also affirmed the District Court’s orders denying class certification as to the plaintiffs,” it added.

The litigation traces back to a 2008 settlement between Pfizer, the maker of Lipitor (atorvastatin), and erstwhile Ranbaxy Laboratories. The US pharma giant had sued the generic competitor, alleging infringement of its patents.

Later the two companies inked a settlement which blocked Ranbaxy to launch its generic copy until November 2011.

Accordogn to Pfizer, the patents covered under the agreement, included the basic compound patent, which was valid till 2010; the enantiomer patent (2011); as well as various process and crystalline form patents, which extended till 2016 and 2017.

However, consumers and third-party payors challenged the settlement, alleging that the settlement unlawfully delayed generic competition.

The plaintiffs alleged that Pfizer unlawfully obtained a patent for the drug and the subsequent agreement with Ranbaxy “unlawfully delayed generic competition in the US”, violating certain state antitrust and consumer protection laws.

In June 2024, the New Jersey District Court ruled that the plaintiffs had failed to establish that the settlement was unlawful and enabled Pfizer to maintain its monopoly. Meanwhile, Pfizer agreed to pay $93 million to settle the lawsuit.

Sun Pharma acquired Ranbaxy (it’s second largest) in 2014 from Japanese giant Daiichi Sankyo for a total consideration of around $4billion — $3.2 billion for the acquisition and around $800 million for debt.

The latest ruling concludes a decade-long antitrust dispute and was among several legal battles involving Ranbaxy.

Related Posts

Apollo Navi Mumbai launches geriatric oncology clinic

With a dedicated Geriatric Oncology Clinic, Apollo Hospitals Navi Mumbai brings specialised geriatric cancer care to the private healthcare setting in Navi Mumbai. With the launch of the Geriatric Oncology…

Maharashtra FDA cancels licences of 62 pharma units, 141 chemist shops

Mumbai: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cracked down on medical stores violating drug-sale rules, suspending 599 licences and cancelling another 141 after inspecting 2,295 retail establishments across the…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed

Apollo Navi Mumbai launches geriatric oncology clinic

Apollo Navi Mumbai launches geriatric oncology clinic

Maharashtra FDA cancels licences of 62 pharma units, 141 chemist shops

Maharashtra FDA cancels licences of 62 pharma units, 141 chemist shops

Himachal DCA honoured with ‘Regulatory Excellence Award’ at iPHEX 2026

Himachal DCA honoured with ‘Regulatory Excellence Award’ at iPHEX 2026

Baddi pharma firm loses licence after 1,200-kg tapentadol haul

Baddi pharma firm loses licence after 1,200-kg tapentadol haul

US FDA takes steps to maintain newborn access to life-saving starter nutrition products

US FDA takes steps to maintain newborn access to life-saving starter nutrition products

Mankind Pharma launches campaign to inspire 1 crore Indians to pledge for organ donation